• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Martin Marauder Gold for FS9 has been released

Well, lost all wing progress today due to my inattention to details. :)

Started out on the wings, got one about half done with ailerons and trim tab finished when I realized some errors on the 3-views, all of them regarding flaps.

The Marauder has split, slotted flaps inboard and outboard of the nacelles on the long wing variants.
All my 3-views show slotted flaps but not split flaps.

This was on top of some 3-views showing a conventional airfoil versus the symmetrical NACA 0017. Invested a lot of time trying to find the NACA 0017-64 and it was no where to be found. So I improvised creating the bottom curve to match the top curve. Went to measure my vertical distances at the root and tip and they were off across the whole wing.

Was not happy with all of that so I scrapped the wing to start over. Still trying to find the airfoil drawing before I restart. Anybody have access to the NACA 0017 and 0010, I would appreciate the help. LOL Such is life; I knew this morning that today wasn't a good modeling day; nothing seemed to go right. :)

Milton, are you sure about the split flaps? From everything I've seen, the short wing Marauders had the split slotted flaps while the long winged seemed to have Martin's own take on Fowler Flaps, rather similar in design to the Mariner, with double hinges on each arm to push it aft and rotate it:
attachment.php
attachment.php


P.S. Forgot I had this flight manual as well, for the long wing version:
http://1.airwar.z8.ru/transfer/manual/[aviation]%20-%20[manuals]%20-%20B-26%20Pilot%20Training%20Manual.pdf
Lists incidence of the airfoils, control surface limits and has some nice illustrations
 

Attachments

  • vue_ar_aile_droite.jpg
    vue_ar_aile_droite.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 3
  • flaps.jpg
    flaps.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 3
Milton, are you sure about the split flaps? From everything I've seen, the short wing Marauders had the split slotted flaps while the long winged seemed to have Martin's own take on Fowler Flaps, rather similar in design to the Mariner, with double hinges on each arm to push it aft and rotate it:

...snipped...

No I am not; am still researching, but your post is heartening. :) Gives me more confidence that the 3-views have validity.

Okay, just now found 4 different reference pics and one cutaway that validate your statement. Thanks for that refreshing morning slap in the face. :) I am awake again.

Also had a copy of that training pdf from another source. Thank you so much. With that resolved and the air foil (thank you Duckie), I can proceed. :jump:
 
One more a little more detailed.

attachment.php

That looks nice as well Steve.

I am trying to reconcile the height differences from the previously posted pics.

The 0017 is 17% thickness compared to the chord length. This one looks "fat". :) Although, when you count the grid squares, and divide by the height squares, it seems to work out.
 
Anyone have wing info on root and tip chord length for the B-C models? I cannot find that anywhere.

From the drawings, the root appears to be 158" and 27" high at apex which comes in at 17% but not sure how close that is. I have nothing on the tip length.
 
That looks nice as well Steve.

I am trying to reconcile the height differences from the previously posted pics.

The 0017 is 17% thickness compared to the chord length. This one looks "fat". :) Although, when you count the grid squares, and divide by the height squares, it seems to work out.

Milton, I can't vouch for the sources. They were pretty well buried in the WWW but, according to the site and doc titles, they are from aeronautical engineering houses and are abstracts submitted for current (at the time they were submitted) projects. As far as I could tell, one was for a hydro foil design, and the other was for an aft fuselage stub wing mount for some kind of turbo-fan powered business jet.

Like Sgt. Schultz, "I know KNOOOW NUHTHINK!" I was just searching for "NACA 0017 airfoil" and turned these up hoping they might be helpful.

Steve
 
Milton, I can't vouch for the sources. They were pretty well buried in the WWW but, according to the site and doc titles, they are from aeronautical engineering houses and are abstracts submitted for current (at the time they were submitted) projects. As far as I could tell, one was for a hydro foil design, and the other was for an aft fuselage stub wing mount for some kind of turbo-fan powered business jet.

Like Sgt. Schultz, "I know KNOOOW NUHTHINK!" I was just searching for "NACA 0017 airfoil" and turned these up hoping they might be helpful.

Steve

No problem Steve. I am using the earlier versions you posted; seems to match up closely with what I had and the numbers prove out. Thank you :)
 
No I am not; am still researching, but your post is heartening. :) Gives me more confidence that the 3-views have validity.

Okay, just now found 4 different reference pics and one cutaway that validate your statement. Thanks for that refreshing morning slap in the face. :) I am awake again.

Also had a copy of that training pdf from another source. Thank you so much. With that resolved and the air foil (thank you Duckie), I can proceed. :jump:
You're quite welcome. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. As for the wing root and tip length, I don't really know, but the museum should be able to send you some blueprints that list those, since the ones they gave me for the Super Marauder did.
 
Okay, once I got my act together (thanks to all of you), it took only a few hours to knock out the wings.

Now on to the engines. :jump:
 

Attachments

  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-019.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-019.jpg
    18.7 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-016.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-016.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-017.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-017.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-021.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-021.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-020.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-020.jpg
    10.3 KB · Views: 0
Some cleanup here on the gun pods and wing fit to the fuselage now done.
 

Attachments

  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-022.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-022.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-023.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-12-023.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 0
Building these engines from scratch by necessity. It is painstakingly slow since there is no real 3-view help on these engines aside from general size .... :) Requires a lot of picture reference and do and redo. This represents 5 hours work but things are starting to look right on the cowling. Just getting started on this and much to do.
 

Attachments

  • enginestart.jpg
    enginestart.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 4
Just an update on cowling and intakes progress. I think I have it pretty close now. Chunked in some props at the appropriate size (13.5') to see if it could stand up to scrutiny.

Now on to the nacelles ...
 

Attachments

  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-001.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-001.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-002.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-002.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 0
  • HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-003.jpg
    HOMEUNIT-2017-feb-13-003.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 0
I must've been asleep against a log cabin the woods. I swear I didn't see this thread. I love the Marauder. It is an aircraft they called a Widow Maker but proved itself over and over again in combat scenarios. It was tough and would bring it's crew home under some terrible situations. I think the early Marauder had some flight and landing issues that were addressed by lengthening the wings and reinforcing the landing gear. Thanks Milton...this is gonna be awesome.
Ted
 
Koku-fan drawings

Milton sorry I'm late to this post, but the b-26 is my favorite bomber and I am flying most of your planes. So I thought I'd try to be helpful. I have B-26 drawings from KOKU-FAN Magazine I could give you. There's 1 three view and 6 profiles. Don't know if I'm too late ,but they are available.
Thanks for the B-26.
BUD
 
Back
Top