Ickie
SOH Administrator
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/10/29/amelia-earhart-plane-fragment-identified/
found Amelia Earhart plane fragment
found Amelia Earhart plane fragment
-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Amelia Earhart plane fragment
- Thread starter Ickie
- Start date
gradyhappyg
Charter Member
Kind of odd they found this back in 1991 and have just now decided it's a piece of her plane.
Ickie
SOH Administrator
Bookman1960
SOH-CM-2023
I think this is an interesting bit of historical research and I look forward to hearing if any future underwater search turns up additional credible corroborative evidence.
As a trained historian, I can appreciate the long time it takes to establish theories, arguments and such for controversial arguments.
I think TIGHAR has provided some very interesting forensic analysis with their claim. The page I was reading on their site, sent me to a very detailed and well-documented discussion (complete with photos) that clearly demonstrates the forensic analysis the TIGHAR group is using to make their claims.
Link: http://tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Archives/Research/Bulletins/73_StepbyStep/73_Step_by_Step.html
Just thought I'd chime in.
As a trained historian, I can appreciate the long time it takes to establish theories, arguments and such for controversial arguments.
I think TIGHAR has provided some very interesting forensic analysis with their claim. The page I was reading on their site, sent me to a very detailed and well-documented discussion (complete with photos) that clearly demonstrates the forensic analysis the TIGHAR group is using to make their claims.
Link: http://tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Archives/Research/Bulletins/73_StepbyStep/73_Step_by_Step.html
Just thought I'd chime in.
Sorry Bookman, I disagree entirely.
Tighar has done nothing but twist any facts, if any, to justify their theory.
They have decided to put AE on Gardner Is. and have bent, twisted, changed, rewrote anything and everything to make it so.
Again, with out any actual facts what so ever.
I would really like to know what really happened, but lets keep an open mind.
Tighar has done nothing but twist any facts, if any, to justify their theory.
They have decided to put AE on Gardner Is. and have bent, twisted, changed, rewrote anything and everything to make it so.
Again, with out any actual facts what so ever.
I would really like to know what really happened, but lets keep an open mind.