• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Helicopter control surfaces

PRB

Administrator
Staff member
I shot this pic last week at the RAAF Amberley Aviation Heritage Centre It's a UH-1 tail surface. Notice anything interesting? They screwed it on upside down! I've seen lots of helicopters, including H-1s, but I have never noticed this detail before. After a bit of Googling, it seems that the idea was to impart a nose up (tail down) force when the ship was moving forward because getting these things to move forward involves "pushing the nose down" and the designers wanted the tail surface to counteract this tenancy. The other interesting bit about this pic is that in this particular case, the surface is angled such that it would impart a nose down force. Is the tail surface on the H-1 movable? Can it be trimmed? If it is "trimmable", it seems they could have achieved the same effect with a "neutrally" shaped cross section, rather than an upside down airfoil. Very interesting.
 
Actually, if I remember from my modelling days, I think this is correct. I always thought it was positioned to account for the rotor downdraft. I found a couple of examples of different positions so it might be set for a particular airframe.
 

Attachments

  • huey tail 2.jpg
    huey tail 2.jpg
    103.9 KB · Views: 0
  • huey tail 3.jpg
    huey tail 3.jpg
    120.8 KB · Views: 0
Good catch and one can review aerodynamics to determine the purpose of the "synchronized elevator" on the Huey. I have not flown a UH-1 yet, but the H-60 stabilator moved to help maintain a level flight attitude and control-ability.
 
From Wiki: The UH-1H also features a synchronized elevator on the tail boom, which is linked to the cyclic control and allows a wider center of gravity range.

Also, from Airvector.net:
[FONT=&quot]The Model 204...[/FONT][FONT=&quot] tail boom was fitted with a tailplane to help keep the helicopter level in forward flight.
[/FONT]

Does that help answer the question?
Pat☺
 
Nothing wrong with the picture as its correct

Its like that to keep the tail down to in flight otherwise with the pitch of the blades and helo it wouldnt fly level
 

Attachments

  • images (8).jpeg
    images (8).jpeg
    27.9 KB · Views: 0
Interesting to see the negative angle of the aerofoil (sorry airfoil?) relative to the boom (fuselage) centreline (waterline/datum) there must be one h*ll of a downwash there from the rotor.....
 
Back
Top