• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

More RAM or fast RAM?

deimos256

Charter Member
I upgraded my RAM a while back to 4 gig and it runs at about 800Mhz, if I put my original 2 gigs in with it the speed drops to somewhere around 600 Mhz. So my question is does the amount of ram outweigh the 200Mhz hit, or is 2 gigs less at +/- 800Mhz better? Any input is appreciated!
 
I upgraded my RAM a while back to 4 gig and it runs at about 800Mhz, if I put my original 2 gigs in with it the speed drops to somewhere around 600 Mhz. So my question is does the amount of ram outweigh the 200Mhz hit, or is 2 gigs less at +/- 800Mhz better? Any input is appreciated!

That's because the older RAM sticks are 600 MHz (more than likely 633 MHZ) while the new RAM sticks are 800 MHz. Your system will only read the lower speed. In order to add two more Gigs of RAM and maintain 800 MHz, you will have to purchase two more sticks rated at that speed.

Caz
 
You also need to consider the brand, even when the two sticks were of the same size, one can be fastest than the other because of the clock cycles it takes to read data
 
4 GB is probably sufficient and I don't think you will see any benefit from 6 GB of slower RAM. You might actually get decreased performance with the slower RAM. You also have to consider your operating system. 32 bit operating systems address about 3.5 GB of RAM. You can put in 4 GB and it's there, but there is definitely no point in exceeding 4 GB with a 32 bit OS. If you are using a 64 bit OS, then the OS can and will recognize more than 4 GB of RAM and will use it if necessary. I don't think FSX needs a system with more than 4 GB, but maybe I'm wrong.
 
Granted I really didn't do any extensive testing, I really didn't notice any changes in fsx. I think I'll just leave the extra 2 gig out and run the 4 at 800. And yes I'm on win7 64
 
Back
Top