• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Where it's at

Wing_Z

Wing_Z

Charter Member 2011
Today's front page at AVSIM carried three dozen new files.
I couldn't help noticing that only one was not for FS2004.
The flightsim community has spoken, and keeps speaking...this is the best version of Flight Simulator that has ever been produced.
It's great to see the ongoing support for it.
 
...and you know wing z.....as terrible of a thing as microsoft has done to the Aces team.....could benefit FS9. I would rather it NOT be that way, but now the payware developers MIGHT take a second look at the FS9 platform as a viable means to make some $$$. I, nor anyone else on this site (or any other FS site, for that matter) agree with what Microsoft has done. I'm just trying to look at it from a different perspective, I guess. FSX development will advance, and the two sims together will move forward.
 
Felixthreeone said:
...and you know wing z.....as terrible of a thing as microsoft has done to the Aces team.....could benefit FS9. I would rather it NOT be that way, but now the payware developers MIGHT take a second look at the FS9 platform as a viable means to make some $$$. I, nor anyone else on this site (or any other FS site, for that matter) agree with what Microsoft has done. I'm just trying to look at it from a different perspective, I guess. FSX development will advance, and the two sims together will move forward.
Click to expand...
Good point Felix. I was making a similar point to someone on Teamspeak last evening. Basically the same thought, that with no real viable alternatives on the horizon, developers might be more apt to consider FS9 as a "could be", rather than a "has been". I have both FSX and FS9 and have been flying FS9 a lot and getting good feedback from folks that think the same way. What MS has done to the ACES folks is a real shame and I hope those folks recoup from this and continue on, but it may very well have set in motion a "backwards compatible" trend to FS9 developement.:gossip:
 
I was looking at the Flight Replica's L-4 Grasshopper the other week, and was gutted that it's only for FSX.

I've been praying for a decent L-4 as the default one is virtually unpaintable due to the way MS did the texture mapping. I do hope they are one of those that sees the light and reworks a version for FS9, as I'd be at the front of the queue to buy it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top