There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
For FS2020 fliers, the dark (or too-bright) displays and missing pilots are fixed.Curious to hear what has changed!
Priller
I did see that about the Creator label. I'm surprised at the still missing aircraft as most are the 2020 Asobo legend models.For FS2020 fliers, the dark (or too-bright) displays and missing pilots are fixed.
As for the Marketplace stuff, FAC257, the “creator not approved” stuff still works as well as it did before, it’s just a classification to let you know if it’s tested/approved. It’s only the “not available” stuff you can’t even try.
Developers have to test and approve their ports for MSFS 2024 in order to remove the "not approved" tag, so it's on them to take action. In other words, it's a feature, not a bug....Also, many of the aircraft that were flyable are now marked as "Creator Not Approved". For that second part it would be nice to hear from them are those now dead-end products or are they working to get them approved.
I've read that battle somewhere before a while back, on "whose job is it" to fix Asobo aircraft in the MP.There was an interesting exchange on the Aeroplane Heaven Facebook last night (since deleted by AH, everything now sweetness and light).
The topic started with them asking for a Beta tester for the Lancaster but quickly went south with multiple posters taking them to task for the low quality of (eg) the 707 and it's obvious lack of testing.
AH said it was no longer anything to do with them and Microsoft tested it and everything was now down to MS.
Which suggests that for the local legends etc it should be Microsoft retesting them (or paying the original developers to do so)...
I need to correct a few things here. Firstly, that post was deleted because a) it got out of hand and b) had nothing whatsoever to do with the recruiting of beta testers for the Lancaster.There was an interesting exchange on the Aeroplane Heaven Facebook last night (since deleted by AH, everything now sweetness and light).
The topic started with them asking for a Beta tester for the Lancaster but quickly went south with multiple posters taking them to task for the low quality of (eg) the 707 and it's obvious lack of testing.
AH said it was no longer anything to do with them and Microsoft tested it and everything was now down to MS.
Which suggests that for the local legends etc it should be Microsoft retesting them (or paying the original developers to do so)...