-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
P3D V2 Details/Pricing
- Thread starter Phantom88
- Start date
Crusader
SOH-CM-2022
Thanks Phantom88 for HU . I haven't been over to Prepar3D for a few days . I was very happy to see this in the link you provided :
" Prepar3D v2 will be available for purchase and digital download via the Prepar3D.com store on Monday Nov 25[SUP]th"
Rich[/SUP]
TeiscoDelRay
Life Time CM
200 bucks, I think FSX is looking good enough.
Dangerous Beans
SOH-CM-2022
£37 for the Academic licence sounds good to me. I just hope all the troll posts on various forums about the licence over the last few months hasn't prompted LM to make us jump through hoops to buy it.
Navy Chief
Senior Member
YIPEE! Getting the credit card ready now!
You can always purchase the developer's edition. It's $20 a month, which means that it will take 10 years to reach the purchase price.
Navy Chief
Senior Member
Ok, with that in mind, will the lesser versions of P3DV2 accept addons to give it the ablility to do military simulation?? NC
I am beginning to rethink purchasing it, if not.
Sure, but the developer won't be able to access the more sophisticated weapons solutions available, like guided weapons.
Navy Chief
Senior Member
UnknownGuest12
New member
Academic License
$59.95
Is it correct to say that this version will be similar in features (for the better) with actual FSX, meaning if I just want to fly around, no need for weaponry, this version will be more than enough? If so, will buy it, not going to spend 200's...
Thanks
$59.95
Is it correct to say that this version will be similar in features (for the better) with actual FSX, meaning if I just want to fly around, no need for weaponry, this version will be more than enough? If so, will buy it, not going to spend 200's...
Thanks
Navy Chief
Senior Member
I would say it will be, yes. Much better graphics capability (based on what I have seen with screenshots and teaser videos). NC
Phantom88
Charter Member
Good Point
Phantom88
Charter Member
Great Point
Dino Cattaneo
Charter Member
One comment about the Professional Plus (Military) edition:
Lockheed Martin sent me a preview of the "Weapons" SDK - and I have a Professional Plus Beta Licence. From what I see in the Beta, this is not really for "us".
The implementation is very generic in nature (which is good if you have the resources to develop for it) but does not provide many of the tools that Tacpack implements.
The key point, I believe, is that you can "slave" P3DV2 objects to external computations for flight / sensor modeling and such stuff - so the purpose of P3DV2 would mostly be, IMHO, to act as a little more than a graphic engine (for example it would be quite easy to genereate photoreal sceneries from satellite imagery to have up-to-date training scenarios of remote areas) - external software (or hardware) can do the flight and sensor modeling.
This is would be much like an Eurofighter simulator from EADS I had the chance to fly at DSEi in London some weeks ago - key point in that simulator (which was based on OpenFlight) was the fact you could generate bespoke scenery in one day or two (Lybia in my case).
While I am sure there will be many who would really like to have the same tools as the military, I believe Professional Plus is not thought for the hobbyists. I really hope VRS can provide a reasonably priced version of Tacpack for P3Dv2.
Lockheed Martin sent me a preview of the "Weapons" SDK - and I have a Professional Plus Beta Licence. From what I see in the Beta, this is not really for "us".
The implementation is very generic in nature (which is good if you have the resources to develop for it) but does not provide many of the tools that Tacpack implements.
The key point, I believe, is that you can "slave" P3DV2 objects to external computations for flight / sensor modeling and such stuff - so the purpose of P3DV2 would mostly be, IMHO, to act as a little more than a graphic engine (for example it would be quite easy to genereate photoreal sceneries from satellite imagery to have up-to-date training scenarios of remote areas) - external software (or hardware) can do the flight and sensor modeling.
This is would be much like an Eurofighter simulator from EADS I had the chance to fly at DSEi in London some weeks ago - key point in that simulator (which was based on OpenFlight) was the fact you could generate bespoke scenery in one day or two (Lybia in my case).
While I am sure there will be many who would really like to have the same tools as the military, I believe Professional Plus is not thought for the hobbyists. I really hope VRS can provide a reasonably priced version of Tacpack for P3Dv2.
Dino Cattaneo
Charter Member
I guess the big red "X" is the result of the always precious work of marketing and legal department (agreements with Microsoft, product placement, company mission, etc. etc.) ...
"Learning" is definitely a label that suits to my simulation activities. This does not mean I am not having fun with it.
"Learning" is definitely a label that suits to my simulation activities. This does not mean I am not having fun with it.
No, it's not at all ridiculous. It is put there for strictly legal reasons, for which there's no need to explicate further.Don't you think that those big red X for "Personal Consumer Entertainment" is something little bit ridiculous .... ???
What I do think is ridiculous is that for the past twenty-five years flight simmers have been outraged whenever anyone referred to FS as a "game", and screamed loudly "It's not a game, it's a simulator!!!"
Now, some of those same flight simmers are crying in despair that Prepar3D is "...not a game, so I can't play it!"
Good grief!
italoc
Charter Member
I fully agree with you, Dino (and I understand also the legal implications)
In fact Flight Simulation for many of us is not a "game" but a way to replace the temporary or final loss of "flying for real" because of many reasons such as age, cost, difficult access to flying facilities etc.
Italo