henrystreet
Charter Member
Full disclosure: I own a couple dollars worth of DCS content, most of which was not bought on sale.
I support their development efforts with my hard earned dollars. In full truth, I was amazed and very pleased to see their 2 civilian based products (will probably buy them both).
I agree completely that we are living in a fantastic era for our hobby in many ways. However, to prefer their simulator solely for performance is to prefer AeroFly FS as well. It is not a "wrong" position but it is a very limiting one.
After a consumer buys a dozen or so DCS modules, they would have spent enough money to buy upgrade hardware.
As Ripcord pointed out, it is Eagle Dynamics lack of openness in the development cycle that will ultimately limit their market share and their appeal.
I support their development efforts with my hard earned dollars. In full truth, I was amazed and very pleased to see their 2 civilian based products (will probably buy them both).
I agree completely that we are living in a fantastic era for our hobby in many ways. However, to prefer their simulator solely for performance is to prefer AeroFly FS as well. It is not a "wrong" position but it is a very limiting one.
After a consumer buys a dozen or so DCS modules, they would have spent enough money to buy upgrade hardware.
As Ripcord pointed out, it is Eagle Dynamics lack of openness in the development cycle that will ultimately limit their market share and their appeal.