• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Flying Stations closing shop

harrybasset said:
Hi Cees

There is an earlier one from Alphasim which I don't think has the depth of systems like the Flying Stations production. There is also that from UKMil which I think is mainly RAF for land based flights.
Catapult launches seem to have been with full flap down to get maximum lift with full bleed air blow and 5 degrees of nose down trim set. I'll keep digging.

Mike.
Click to expand...

Nose down trim needed to balance the tailplane flaps (yes, the Bucc had FLAPS on tailplane not separate elevators!)

ttfn

Pete
 
Think I found out what was causing this: the Buccaneer is not compatible with the RFN gauge! Or have people other insights? As soon as I changed back to the original panel.cfg, everything was okay again!


Cees
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top