-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Hungaroring.
- Thread starter wombat666
- Start date
Incredible that Ferrari could mess this up so badly...
My opinionated thoughts...
1) Binotto should not be the team principal. He is an engineer an I think a really good one - have him do what he is good at - managing the car NOT the team. If you notice he is all about models simulations the data always the data. Nothing wrong with that but a team principal has to balance all the inputs not just rely on one to the exclusion of others. Ferrari needs a team principal that recognizes when conditions are outside the range of their data an make decisions more heavily based on other criteria like maybe their believing their own they thought lying eyes.
2) Find a competent strategist like Mercedes and RB have if you don't have one. I don't know the extent to which Binotto overrules the strategists but my gawd. Is there anything to the rumour that the lead strategist is sabotaging LeClerc to favour Sainz? I tend to doubt it but who knows.
3) Listen to the drivers and the drivers have to not be as meek as LeClerc.
4) Does team Ferrari run scenarios between races that could happen? If not that is incompetent.
What say you?
-Ed-
