• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

That, dear boy, is because we don't know what it is.

With vulgar chrome mudgards, one immediately thought American, (whitewall tyres would have been a clincher), but I also recognised the Gipsy motors, and they weren't big in the U.S.

Looks Koolhoveny too, but can't pin it down. Not a Brit, I think, and all this leads to the dreaded conclusion that it has been dredged up from some Ruritanian aero scrapbook........
 
Time to reveal. This one is from Austria, a Hopfner HV 12-34.

Here is a much easier one. A sturdy float plane.
 
OK, time to move on.

The floating lady is an Aichi AB-4B.

Well the sun has disappeared again from Scotland, the Lions have been beaten in South Africa (rugby tour), but, lo! a Brit survives into the second week of Wimbledon.

We haven't had a chopper for a while - here's a rather unusual one.
 
Try this twin. It is "homebuilt" and only one exists (existed). :icon_lol:
It was converted from a rather well known single high wing type.
 
Wout, dear boy, homebuilds are usually streng verboten in this forum, mainly because there are just so many of them. If some deranged Panamanian poppy-muncher collects all the wrecks from his local flying school and assembles the Rodriguez Flyer, there's no way we get to know about it, or even care.
One-offs are OK if they are somehow unusual, but Piper/Cessna clones just don't cut the mustard.

Having said that, this looks like it has some Auster/Taylorcraft in it, other than that, haven't a clue.

Sorry if I seem intemperate - the weather has been oppressive and humid here and I feel quite homicidal.......:tgun2:
 
The twin is the Pierce U-2 Arrow. Built with a Stinson 108 Voyager fuselage/tail
I'll substitute this ring tail one. NOT a homebuilt, but produced by a well known manufacturer of light aircraft.
 
Well, I was on the Stinson trail but didn't turn anything up. At least I was on the right track!

Never seen this pusher before. Very interesting.
 
A couple of clues. Yes it is European (East of my home country)
It appeared in 1958 and accompanying photos show the aircraft in original and final forms. The ring tail was the middle (second) form.
The manufacturer built (amongst others) the Elster
 
Back
Top