• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Whats wrong?

Collin

Charter Member
These 2 photo's appeared on Ebay recently, can anyone see whats wrong with them?

The first was labeled "USS Monterey_foundering in a typhoon".
The second was labeled "Victorious after Kamikaze attack".

regards Collin:ernae:
 
i'm thinking the Monterey pic is reversed...it should look like this..
 
i'm thinking the Monterey pic is reversed...it should look like this..

Correct!:woot:

Also she didn't founder, but did suffer damage from a fire started when an aircraft broke loose in the hangar and crashed into several others.

With the mis-labelling of this photo it should now help you with the second.

regards Collin:ernae:
 
hmm i don't know...the Imperial War Museum seems to think its Victorious..
 
ok i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that is not Victorious but is possibly Formidable...maybe

both ships were hit by Kamikaze attacks (an absolutely great time to have a steel deck instead of wood) but i think Formidable was hit in the island/deck area where the picture shows it burning.

a couple of different sites say that a steam pipe was ruptured on both ships?...and we can obviously see steam coming out of something.

both ships had the fires out and were launching and recovering aircraft within and hour or two after being hit.

if those had been Essex class carriers they probably would have been knocked out of action...or worse.
 
I am checking my sources, but you may have already given the answer.

But the naval-history address you gave has some nice photos of Dirtman in his other quise as Michael Stupid.:costumes:


regards Collin:ernae:
 
Busted again!

yall are krazy man:icon_lol::icon_lol:

Yo RR;

Sounds like you've never been to Kanada Bro.

.....View attachment 81253


3 things to remember:

1) Insanity is NOT a "state of mind" .... it's a "way of life" :isadizzy:

2) It's always better to have a "bottle in front of me" than a "frontal lobotomy"
View attachment 81254


3) Everything
is ALWAYS Collin's fault.

View attachment 81257



- But he's me Brudder cuz he shares his grog wit me. :friday:
.........(Shhhh!! .... don't let him find out)
.
.....View attachment 81255
 
Yep, I agree Dirtman. Insanity is a way of life, Madness is "a state of mind"
 
The answer to 2 is...

HMS Formidable, 4th May 1945.

I think its due to the amount of aircraft parked on the stern, when Victorious was hit she had her deckpark midships and bow.

The later carriers in this class had a higher freeboard to account for the extra height in the hangar space.

regards Collin:ernae:
 
Back
Top